Compare the performance of Dylan Gwydion programs against some other language implementation.

For more information about the Dylan implementation we measured see ↓ about Dylan Gwydion.

Compare to:

 Dylan Gwydion comparison summary


1/2 1/3 1/4 … Dylan Gwydion is better
Programs Time Memory Use Source Size Reduced N
chameneos-reduxNo program
fannkuchNo program
regex-dnaNo program
reverse-complementNo program
partial-sumsFailed
pidigitsFailed
spectral-normFailed
sum-fileFailed
nsieve-bitsFailed
nsieveFailed
fastaFailed
mandelbrotFailed
k-nucleotideFailed
n-body±1/5±
binary-trees±±±
recursive51/4± 7

± look at the measurements

 Dylan Gwydion comparison measurements

Program & Logs CPU secs Memory KB Size B Elapsed secs ~ CPU Load
 n-body 
Dylan Gwydion24.372,2681543  
Java 6 -server27.5410,8881430  
 binary-trees 
Dylan Gwydion6.8322,232601  
Java 6 -server #27.5624,012603  
 recursive N = 7 reduced workload 
Dylan Gwydion3.482,612615  
Java 6 -server0.689,652427  

 about Dylan Gwydion

Home Page: http://www.gwydiondylan.org

Download: http://www.gwydiondylan.org/download.html

Revised BSD license