Compare the performance of Io programs against some other language implementation.
For more information about the Io implementation we measured see ↓ about Io.
Io comparison summary
| 1/2 1/3 1/4 … Io is better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programs | Time | Memory Use | Source Size | Reduced N |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| k-nucleotide | ||||
| pidigits | ||||
| regex-dna | ||||
| n-body | ||||
| recursive | ||||
| mandelbrot | ||||
| nsieve | ||||
| fannkuch | ||||
| fasta | 6 | 4 | ± | |
| spectral-norm | 11 | ± | ± | 3,000 |
| partial-sums | 12 | 4 | ± | |
| sum-file | 13 | 2 | ± | |
| binary-trees | 16 | 3 | ± | |
| nsieve-bits | 32 | 4 | 2 | |
| reverse-complement | 127 | ± | ± | |
± look at the measurements
Io comparison measurements
| Program & Logs | CPU secs | Memory KB | Size B | Elapsed secs | ~ CPU Load |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fasta | |||||
| Io | 5,255.94 | 14,112 | 688 | ||
| Perl #4 | 850.67 | 3,156 | 934 | ||
| spectral-norm N = 3,000 reduced workload | |||||
| Io #2 | 13,240.34 | 15,740 | 371 | ||
| Perl #2 | 1,168.93 | 18,536 | 334 | ||
| partial-sums | |||||
| Io | 164.29 | 13,560 | 381 | ||
| Perl #3 | 14.23 | 3,156 | 389 | ||
| sum-file | |||||
| Io | 202.06 | 25,080 | 104 | ||
| Perl | 15.55 | 14,916 | 84 | ||
| binary-trees | |||||
| Io | 3,607.79 | 108,776 | 400 | ||
| Perl | 224.06 | 37,588 | 481 | ||
| nsieve-bits | |||||
| Io | 3,038.40 | 16,052 | 380 | ||
| Perl | 93.55 | 4,024 | 253 | ||
| reverse-complement | |||||
| Io | 252.22 | 29,964 | 369 | ||
| Perl #2 | 1.99 | 38,356 | 298 | ||
about Io
Exception: unable to read file '--version'
Home Page: http://www.iolanguage.com
Download: http://www.iolanguage.com/downloads/
