Compare the performance of SML MLton programs against some other language implementation, or check the SML CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the SML implementation we measured see ↓ about SML MLton.
Are the SML MLton programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the SML MLton programs than the corresponding C GNU gcc programs?
| SML MLton x times better ~ C GNU gcc x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | 1.3 | ~7.4 | 1.3 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~2.5 | ~8.1 | 1.0 | |
| fasta | ~1.6 | ~1.0 | ~1.1 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~2.5 | ~7.3 | 1.1 | |
| mandelbrot | ~1.1 | ~1.0 | ~1.1 | |
| n-body | ~1.3 | ~1.0 | ~1.1 | |
| nsieve | ~1.4 | ~6.9 | ~1.2 | |
| nsieve-bits | ~1.6 | ~1.7 | ~1.1 | |
| partial-sums | ~1.1 | ~7.3 | ~1.4 | |
| pidigits | ~4.2 | ~1.2 | 1.4 | |
| recursive | ~2.5 | ~6.5 | ~1.1 | |
| regex-dna | ||||
| reverse-complement | ~3.2 | ~4.7 | ~1.2 | |
| spectral-norm | ~2.0 | 5.9 | ~1.2 | |
| startup | ~2.3 | 2.1 | ||
| sum-file | ~1.7 | 4.7 | 1.2 | |
| thread-ring | ||||
about SML MLton
MLton 20070826
Whole-Program Compilation in MLton (pdf slides)
Home Page: http://mlton.org/
Download: http://mlton.org/download/
