Compare the performance of Scheme MzScheme programs against some other language implementation, or check the Scheme CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the Scheme implementation we measured see ↓ about Scheme MzScheme.
Are the Scheme MzScheme programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the Scheme MzScheme programs than the corresponding Perl programs?
| Scheme MzScheme x times better ~ Perl x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | ||||
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | 5.0 | ~1.4 | ~2.1 | |
| fasta | 2.4 | ~1.5 | ~1.1 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~1.6 | ~1.8 | ~1.8 | |
| mandelbrot | ~2.1 | ~1.4 | ~1.7 | |
| n-body | ~2.3 | ~2.5 | ~1.3 | |
| nsieve | 8.5 | 3.0 | ~1.6 | |
| nsieve-bits | 7.1 | ~1.7 | ~2.6 | |
| partial-sums | ~2.8 | ~1.5 | ~1.7 | |
| pidigits | ~14.6 | ~1.8 | ~1.2 | |
| recursive | 10.8 | 1.9 | ~1.5 | |
| regex-dna | 1.4 | ~5.3 | ~1.8 | |
| reverse-complement | ~2.6 | ~2.0 | ~2.0 | |
| spectral-norm | 1.1 | ~1.1 | ~1.4 | 3,000 |
| startup | ~6.7 | ~1.9 | ||
| sum-file | ~4.4 | ~1.1 | ~1.9 | |
| thread-ring | ||||
about Scheme MzScheme
MzScheme version 360
Home Page: http://www.plt-scheme.org
Download: http://download.plt-scheme.org/drscheme/
