Compare the performance of Ada 2005 GNAT programs against some other language implementation, or check the Ada 2005 CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the Ada 2005 implementation we measured see ↓ about Ada 2005 GNAT.
Are the Ada 2005 GNAT programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the Ada 2005 GNAT programs than the corresponding C GNU gcc programs?
| Ada 2005 GNAT x times better ~ C GNU gcc x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | ~1.4 | ~1.5 | ~1.4 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~1.7 | ~1.2 | ~1.2 | |
| fasta | ~2.3 | 1.1 | ~1.1 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~2.2 | ~2.0 | ~1.9 | 100,000 |
| mandelbrot | ~1.3 | ~1.1 | ~1.0 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | ~1.8 | ~1.2 | ~1.4 | |
| nsieve | ~1.0 | ~1.0 | ~1.4 | |
| nsieve-bits | ~1.7 | ~1.9 | ~1.0 | |
| partial-sums | ~1.2 | ~1.3 | 1.1 | |
| pidigits | 1.0 | ~1.1 | ~1.7 | |
| recursive | 1.0 | ~1.1 | ~1.4 | |
| regex-dna | ~2.3 | ~1.1 | ~1.2 | |
| reverse-complement | ~5.2 | ~1.3 | ~1.2 | |
| spectral-norm | ~1.0 | ~1.3 | ~1.9 | |
| startup | ~2.0 | 1.4 | ||
| sum-file | ~1.8 | ~1.4 | ~1.2 | |
| thread-ring | ~2.6 | ~1.7 | ~1.2 | |
about Ada 2005 GNAT
wikibook Ada Programming
GNAT GPL 2007 (20070402-41) Ada 2005 mode (default)
Home Page: The Libre Site
Download: Download GNAT GPL Edition
