÷

 Are the Haskell GHC programs faster?

Do the Haskell GHC programs use optimized assembly code libraries? Are they small simple programs or very optimized programs? Do the Haskell GHC programs use a fraction of the time used by other programs or do they use several times more?


 Haskell GHC used what fraction? used how many times more? 
Programs Time Memory Code Reduced N
↓ sum-file1/2±
↓ binary-trees±±±
↓ spectral-norm±±
↓ mandelbrot±±
↓ n-body±±
↓ nsieve-bits±±
↓ partial-sums±±
↓ nsieve±1/2±
↓ recursive±±±
↓ reverse-complement±±
↓ fannkuch
↓ k-nucleotide

± look at the measurements and then look at the programs.

 Are the Haskell GHC programs faster?

Program & Logs CPU secs Elapsed secs Memory KB Code B ~ CPU Load
 sum-file 
Haskell GHC4.562,816162  
OCaml8.74692138  
 binary-trees 
Haskell GHC3.359,152512  
OCaml4.838,732469  
 spectral-norm 
Haskell GHC24.82964737  
OCaml31.631,196369  
 mandelbrot 
Haskell GHC5.321,332627  
OCaml6.06716444  
 n-body 
Haskell GHC48.721,6481687  
OCaml54.006441239  
 nsieve-bits 
Haskell GHC4.123,728388  
OCaml4.415,020176  
 partial-sums 
Haskell GHC4.36864476  
OCaml4.64564508  
 nsieve 
Haskell GHC2.126,060396  
OCaml2.169,380295  
 recursive 
Haskell GHC8.051,464447  
OCaml7.471,120389  
 reverse-complement 
Haskell GHC1.2764,192915  
OCaml1.0247,244540  
 fannkuch 
Haskell GHC16.579921005  
OCaml8.30592485  
 k-nucleotide 
Haskell GHC28.56164,7121767  
OCaml13.8334,636845  
 chameneos-redux 
Haskell GHC11.931,528789  
No OCaml
 fasta 
Haskell GHC62.221,6841096  
No OCaml
 pidigits 
Haskell GHC2.862,488377  
No OCaml
 regex-dna
   No program

 Haskell GHC : lazy pure functional programming 

Glasgow Haskell Compiler, Version 6.8.2, for Haskell 98, stage 2 booted by GHC version 6.8.2

Home Page: http://www.haskell.org/

Download: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/

Revised BSD license