Are the Haskell GHC programs faster?
Do the Haskell GHC programs use optimized assembly code libraries? Are they small simple programs or very optimized programs? Do the Haskell GHC programs use a fraction of the time used by other programs or do they use several times more?
| Haskell GHC used what fraction? used how many times more? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programs | Time | Memory | Code | Reduced N |
| ↓ recursive | 1/85 | 1/10 | ± | |
| ↓ mandelbrot | 1/61 | 1/2 | 2× | |
| ↓ fannkuch | 1/47 | 1/2 | 2× | |
| ↓ n-body | 1/41 | ± | 2× | |
| ↓ nsieve-bits | 1/35 | 1/3 | ± | |
| ↓ binary-trees | 1/28 | 1/2 | ± | |
| ↓ chameneos-redux | 1/23 | 1/2 | ± | |
| ↓ fasta | 1/11 | ± | ± | |
| ↓ partial-sums | 1/6 | 1/3 | ± | |
| ↓ sum-file | 1/5 | ± | 2× | |
| ↓ nsieve | 1/4 | 1/6 | 2× | |
| ↓ reverse-complement | 1/2 | ± | 3× | |
| ↓ k-nucleotide | 1/2 | 7× | 4× | |
| ↓ pidigits | ± | ± | ± | |
± look at the measurements and then look at the programs.
Are the Haskell GHC programs faster?
Haskell GHC : lazy pure functional programming
Glasgow Haskell Compiler, Version 6.8.2, for Haskell 98, stage 2 booted by GHC version 6.8.2
Home Page: http://www.haskell.org/
Download: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/
