÷

 Step 1 : Are the Haskell GHC programs faster? At a glance.

This chart shows 3 comparisons - Time-used, Memory-used and Code-used ~ speed and size.

Each chart bar shows, for one unidentified benchmark, how much the fastest Haskell GHC program used compared to the fastest Python CPython program.


 Step 2 : Are the Haskell GHC programs faster? Approximately.

This table shows 3 comparisons - Time-used, Memory-used and Code-used ~ speed and size.

Each table row shows, for one named benchmark, how much the fastest Haskell GHC program used compared to the fastest Python CPython program.

 Haskell GHC used what fraction? used how many times more? 
Benchmark Time Memory Code
 spectral-norm1/1311/3
 nsieve-bits1/511/2±
 n-body1/41±
 fannkuch1/411/2
 recursive1/351/3±
 mandelbrot1/251/31
 chameneos-redux1/231/2±
 fasta1/221/2
 binary-trees1/221/3±
 nsieve1/71/20±
 reverse-complement1/2±
 k-nucleotide1/2
 partial-sums1/21/15±
 pidigits±±±

± read the measurements and then read the program source code.

 Step 3 : Are the Haskell GHC programs faster? Measurements.

This table shows 5 measurements - CPU Time, Elapsed Time, Memory, Code and ≈ CPU Load ~ speed and size.

For each named benchmark, measurements of the fastest Haskell GHC program are shown for comparison against measurements of the fastest Python CPython program.

Program Source Code CPU secs Elapsed secs Memory KB Code B ≈ CPU Load
 spectral-norm 
Haskell GHC24.82964737  
Python CPython3,261.322,900282  
 nsieve-bits 
Haskell GHC0.681,988388  
Python CPython34.974,936288  
 n-body 
Haskell GHC48.721,6481687  
Python CPython2,015.782,4401027  
 fannkuch 
Haskell GHC0.139681005  
Python CPython5.382,404411  
 recursive 
Haskell GHC0.65988447  
Python CPython22.373,048360  
 mandelbrot 
Haskell GHC0.23952627  
Python CPython5.5929,632312  
 chameneos-redux 
Haskell GHC11.931,528789  
Python CPython275.842,576866  
 fasta 
Haskell GHC31.421,5161406  
Python CPython692.042,420779  
 binary-trees 
Haskell GHC3.076,192510  
Python CPython66.9616,172377  
 nsieve 
Haskell GHC1.002,140340  
Python CPython7.3542,400278  
 reverse-complement 
Haskell GHC1.2764,192915  
Python CPython2.7349,072288  
 k-nucleotide 
Haskell GHC28.56164,7121767  
Python CPython58.4525,208475  
 partial-sums 
Haskell GHC4.36864476  
Python CPython7.0312,680482  
 pidigits 
Haskell GHC0.111,492377  
Python CPython0.082,164257  
 regex-dna 
Haskell GHCFailed
Python CPython0.645,484314  

 Step 4 : Are there other Haskell GHC programs for these benchmarks?

Remember - those are just the fastest Haskell GHC and Python CPython programs measured on this OS/machine. Check if there are other implementations of these benchmark programs for Haskell GHC.

Maybe one of those other Haskell GHC programs is fastest on a different OS/machine.

 Step 5 : Are there other faster programs for these benchmarks?

Remember - those are just the fastest Haskell GHC and Python CPython programs measured on this OS/machine. Check if there are faster implementations of these benchmark programs for other programming languages.

Maybe one of those other programs is fastest on a different OS/machine.

 Haskell GHC : lazy pure functional programming 

Glasgow Haskell Compiler, Version 6.8.2, for Haskell 98, stage 2 booted by GHC version 6.8.2

Home Page: http://www.haskell.org/

Download: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/

Revised BSD license

  Home   Flawed   Fastest   License   Help