Compare the performance of Clean programs against some other language implementation, or check the Clean CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the Clean implementation we measured see ↓ about Clean.
Are the Clean programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the Clean programs than the corresponding C GNU gcc programs?
| Clean x times better ~ C GNU gcc x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | ~1.1 | ~3.7 | 1.1 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~1.2 | ~1.3 | ~1.6 | |
| fasta | ~1.5 | ~5.8 | ~1.2 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~2.1 | ~2.2 | ~1.5 | |
| mandelbrot | ~1.6 | ~1.3 | ~1.1 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | ~1.2 | ~1.3 | ~1.5 | |
| nsieve | ~1.0 | ~1.8 | ~1.5 | |
| nsieve-bits | ~1.7 | ~1.7 | ~1.2 | |
| partial-sums | ~1.0 | ~1.4 | 1.3 | |
| pidigits | ~2.1 | ~4.4 | 1.1 | |
| recursive | ~1.5 | ~1.2 | ~1.2 | |
| regex-dna | ||||
| reverse-complement | ~1.7 | ~3.4 | ~1.5 | |
| spectral-norm | ~1.0 | ~3.3 | ~1.8 | |
| startup | ~2.5 | 1.3 | ||
| sum-file | 1.9 | ~1.5 | ~1.2 | |
| thread-ring | ||||
about Clean
Clean Version 2.0 Language Report (HTML)
online book Functional Programming in Clean
version 2.2
Home Page: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~clean/index.html
Download: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~clean/Download/main/main.htm
