Compare the performance of C++ GNU g++ programs against some other language implementation, or check the C++ CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the C++ implementation we measured see ↓ about C++ GNU g++.
Are the C++ GNU g++ programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the C++ GNU g++ programs than the corresponding C GNU gcc programs?
| C++ GNU g++ x times better ~ C GNU gcc x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | ~1.2 | ~1.5 | 1.3 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~1.3 | ~2.2 | 1.1 | |
| fasta | 1.1 | ~1.6 | 1.0 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~1.1 | 3.8 | ~1.2 | |
| mandelbrot | 1.0 | ~2.4 | ~2.0 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | 1.0 | ~2.4 | ~1.5 | |
| nsieve | ~1.0 | ~1.1 | 1.0 | |
| nsieve-bits | ~1.1 | ~1.1 | ||
| partial-sums | 1.0 | ~2.4 | 1.4 | |
| pidigits | ~1.8 | 1.0 | ||
| recursive | 1.1 | ~2.1 | ~1.3 | |
| regex-dna | 1.1 | 1.1 | ~1.5 | |
| reverse-complement | 1.3 | ~1.0 | ~1.1 | |
| spectral-norm | 1.1 | ~2.1 | ~1.2 | |
| startup | ~3.5 | 1.3 | ||
| sum-file | ~1.2 | ~2.7 | ~1.4 | |
| thread-ring | ||||
about C++ GNU g++
C++ 1991-2006, Bjarne Stroustrup (pdf)
gcc version 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2)
Home Page: http://gcc.gnu.org/
Download: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gcc/
