Compare the performance of D Digital Mars programs against some other language implementation, or check the D CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the D implementation we measured see ↓ about D Digital Mars.
Are the D Digital Mars programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the D Digital Mars programs than the corresponding C GNU gcc programs?
| D Digital Mars x times better ~ C GNU gcc x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | ~1.1 | ~1.0 | 1.0 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~1.0 | ~1.6 | 1.3 | |
| fasta | 1.1 | ~1.5 | 1.2 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~1.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 | |
| mandelbrot | ~2.0 | ~1.7 | 1.4 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | ~1.4 | ~1.7 | ~1.1 | |
| nsieve | ~1.0 | ~1.6 | 1.1 | |
| nsieve-bits | ~1.0 | ~1.8 | 1.1 | |
| partial-sums | 1.1 | ~1.6 | 1.7 | |
| pidigits | ~1.0 | ~1.4 | ~1.1 | |
| recursive | ~3.4 | ~2.4 | 1.2 | |
| regex-dna | ~1.1 | ~5.0 | 2.3 | |
| reverse-complement | 1.2 | ~1.0 | 1.1 | |
| spectral-norm | ~1.0 | ~1.6 | ~1.1 | |
| startup | ~2.5 | 1.6 | ||
| sum-file | ~1.1 | ~1.9 | 1.2 | |
| thread-ring | ||||
about D Digital Mars
Digital Mars D Compiler v1.025
Home Page: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/
Download: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/
