Compare the performance of Eiffel SmartEiffel programs against some other language implementation, or check the Eiffel CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the Eiffel implementation we measured see ↓ about Eiffel SmartEiffel.
Are the Eiffel SmartEiffel programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the Eiffel SmartEiffel programs than the corresponding C++ GNU g++ programs?
| Eiffel SmartEiffel x times better ~ C++ GNU g++ x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | 1.1 | ~1.7 | ~1.2 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~1.0 | 2.0 | ~1.4 | |
| fasta | ~1.2 | 1.9 | 1.1 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~8.3 | ~2.5 | 1.5 | |
| mandelbrot | ~1.1 | 2.2 | 2.1 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | ~1.0 | 1.8 | 1.2 | |
| nsieve | ~1.0 | 1.1 | ~1.4 | |
| nsieve-bits | ~1.6 | 1.1 | ~1.1 | |
| partial-sums | 1.0 | 2.0 | ~1.3 | |
| pidigits | ~2.1 | 1.3 | ~1.5 | |
| recursive | ~1.1 | 1.7 | ~1.0 | |
| regex-dna | ~4.3 | ~2.0 | 2.1 | |
| reverse-complement | ~4.7 | ~1.3 | 1.3 | |
| spectral-norm | ~1.1 | 1.1 | ~1.3 | |
| startup | 1.7 | ~1.1 | ||
| sum-file | ~1.1 | 2.2 | 1.3 | |
| thread-ring | ||||
about Eiffel SmartEiffel
Release 2.3 (Thursday July 11th 2007) [Antoine-Auguste Parmentier]
Home Page: http://smarteiffel.loria.fr/
Download: ftp://ftp.loria.fr/pub/loria/SmartEiffel/
