Compare the performance of Erlang HiPE programs against some other language implementation.
For more information about the Erlang implementation we measured see ↓ about Erlang HiPE.
Erlang HiPE comparison summary
| 1/2 1/3 1/4 … Erlang HiPE is better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programs | Time | Memory Use | Source Size | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | 1/2 | ± | ± | |
| partial-sums | ± | 1/2 | ± | |
| chameneos-redux | ± | 1/3 | 1/2 | |
| nsieve | 2 | 1/2 | ± | |
| pidigits | 2 | ± | 1/2 | |
| nsieve-bits | 2 | 1/2 | ± | |
| k-nucleotide | 3 | ± | ± | |
| recursive | 4 | 1/2 | ± | |
| fannkuch | 6 | 1/2 | ± | |
| fasta | 7 | 1/2 | ± | |
| spectral-norm | 7 | ± | ± | |
| regex-dna | 8 | 2 | ± | |
| n-body | 10 | 1/2 | ± | |
| mandelbrot | 15 | 1/2 | ± | |
| reverse-complement | 27 | 6 | ± | |
| sum-file | 82 | 10 | ± | |
± look at the measurements
Erlang HiPE comparison measurements
about Erlang HiPE
All you wanted to know about the HiPE compile (but might have been afraid to ask)
The development of the HiPE system: design and experience report
Erlang (ASYNC_THREADS,HIPE) (BEAM) emulator version 5.6.1
R12B-1
Home Page: http://www.erlang.org/
Download: http://www.erlang.org/download.html
