Compare the performance of Fortran G95 programs against some other language implementation, or check the Fortran CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the Fortran implementation we measured see ↓ about Fortran G95.
Are the Fortran G95 programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the Fortran G95 programs than the corresponding C GNU gcc programs?
| Fortran G95 x times better ~ C GNU gcc x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | ~10.5 | ~2.4 | ~1.2 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~3.9 | ~1.3 | 1.2 | |
| fasta | ~5.1 | ~1.1 | 1.1 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~6.0 | ~1.5 | ~1.9 | |
| mandelbrot | ~1.7 | 1.2 | 120 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | ~1.4 | ~1.4 | ~1.2 | |
| nsieve | ~1.0 | ~1.0 | ~1.0 | |
| nsieve-bits | ~2.0 | ~1.0 | 1.1 | |
| partial-sums | ~1.0 | ~1.5 | 1.4 | |
| pidigits | ~12.3 | ~1.5 | ~2.6 | 500 |
| recursive | ~4.3 | ~2.6 | ~1.5 | |
| regex-dna | ||||
| reverse-complement | ~10.1 | ~1.0 | ~1.1 | |
| spectral-norm | ~1.3 | ~1.7 | ~1.4 | |
| startup | ~2.3 | 1.7 | ||
| sum-file | ~8.9 | ~1.6 | 1.6 | |
| thread-ring | ||||
about Fortran G95
gcc version 4.0.3 (g95 0.91!) Jan 25 2008
Home Page: http://g95.sourceforge.net/
Download: http://g95.sourceforge.net/
