Compare the performance of Haskell GHC programs against some other language implementation.
For more information about the Haskell implementation we measured see ↓ about Haskell GHC.
Haskell GHC comparison summary
| 1/2 1/3 1/4 … Haskell GHC is better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programs | Time | Memory Use | Source Size | Reduced N |
| regex-dna | ||||
| partial-sums | 1/2 | 1/10 | ± | |
| binary-trees | 1/2 | 1/3 | ± | |
| chameneos-redux | ± | 1/8 | 1/2 | |
| nsieve-bits | ± | 1/4 | ± | |
| nsieve | ± | 1/3 | ± | |
| reverse-complement | ± | ± | 2 | |
| spectral-norm | ± | 1/10 | ± | |
| sum-file | ± | 1/4 | ± | |
| recursive | ± | 1/8 | ± | |
| pidigits | ± | 1/4 | 1/2 | |
| fannkuch | ± | 1/9 | 2 | |
| mandelbrot | 2 | 1/8 | ± | |
| k-nucleotide | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| fasta | 3 | 1/5 | ± | |
| n-body | 3 | 1/7 | ± | |
± look at the measurements
Haskell GHC comparison measurements
about Haskell GHC
Glasgow Haskell Compiler, Version 6.8.2, for Haskell 98, stage 2 booted by GHC version 6.8.2
Home Page: http://www.haskell.org/
Download: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/
