PLEASE CHOOSE THE UP-TO-DATE MEASUREMENTS INSTEAD OF THESE! (Read the FAQ!) |
Compare the performance of JavaScript SpiderMonkey programs against some other language implementation.
For more information about the JavaScript implementation we measured see ↓ about JavaScript SpiderMonkey.
| 1/2 1/3 1/4 JavaScript SpiderMonkey is better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programs | Time | Memory Use | Source Size | Reduced N |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| pidigits | ||||
| mandelbrot | ||||
| recursive | 1/2 | 1/2 | ± | 3 |
| binary-trees | 1/2 | 3 | ± | |
| spectral-norm | ± | 27 | ± | |
| regex-dna | ± | 8 | ± | |
| fasta | 2 | 76 | ± | |
| n-body | 2 | 34 | ± | |
| nsieve-bits | 2 | 23 | ± | |
| fannkuch | 2 | 1/2 | ± | |
| nsieve | 2 | 2 | ± | |
| partial-sums | 3 | 45 | ± | |
| k-nucleotide | 4 | 4 | ± | |
| sum-file | 6 | 14 | ± | |
| reverse-complement | 37 | 5 | ± | |
± look at the measurements
"SpiderMonkey", Software 2.0 2/2005, 320KB pdf
ECMAScript standard "ECMA-262 Edition 3" 1.2MB pdf
JavaScript-C 1.7 pre-release 3 2007-04-01
Home Page: http://www.mozilla.org/js/language/
Download: http://www.mozilla.org/js/spidermonkey/