Compare the performance of Lisaac programs against some other language implementation, or check the Lisaac CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the Lisaac implementation we measured see ↓ about Lisaac.
Are the Lisaac programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the Lisaac programs than the corresponding C GNU gcc programs?
| Lisaac x times better ~ C GNU gcc x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | ||||
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~1.1 | 1.0 | ~1.3 | |
| fasta | ~1.0 | ~5.8 | ~1.2 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~1.4 | 2.1 | 1.3 | |
| mandelbrot | 1.1 | ~1.1 | ~1.2 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | ~1.2 | ~1.2 | ~1.4 | |
| nsieve | ~1.0 | ~1.0 | ~1.5 | |
| nsieve-bits | ~1.0 | ~3.6 | ~1.4 | |
| partial-sums | ~1.0 | ~1.2 | 1.3 | |
| pidigits | 1.0 | 1.0 | ~1.4 | |
| recursive | 1.0 | ~1.1 | ~1.4 | |
| regex-dna | ~1.1 | ~2.0 | ~1.2 | |
| reverse-complement | 1.2 | ~2.0 | 1.6 | |
| spectral-norm | ~1.2 | ~1.4 | ||
| startup | ~1.8 | ~1.4 | ||
| sum-file | 1.1 | ~1.1 | ~1.0 | |
| thread-ring | ~1.0 | ~1.9 | ~1.7 | |
about Lisaac
V.0.13 Beta
Lisaac prototype language Programmers Reference Manual (pdf)
Home Page: Lisaac: The power of simplicity at work for operating systems
Download: Compiler and library
