Lisp SBCL ÷ Java 6 -server | Gentoo : Intel® Pentium® 4 Computer Language Benchmarks Game

Compare the performance of Lisp SBCL programs against some other language implementation.

For more information about the Lisp implementation we measured see ↓ about Lisp SBCL.

Compare to:

Lisp SBCL comparison summary

± look at the measurements

Program & Logs	CPU secs	Memory KB	Size B
partial-sums
Lisp SBCL #2	4.39	16,944	505
Java 6 -server #3	9.15	8,488	474
binary-trees
Lisp SBCL #2	3.72	36,324	553
Java 6 -server #2	6.89	26,808	603
fannkuch
Lisp SBCL #2	7.70	17,344	624
Java 6 -server #4	11.05	8,884	555
reverse-complement
Lisp SBCL	1.40	38,828	896
Java 6 -server #4	1.30	58,932	592
spectral-norm
Lisp SBCL	26.05	18,652	625
Java 6 -server	24.01	10,008	514
recursive
Lisp SBCL #3	8.45	17,460	523
Java 6 -server	6.76	12,044	427
k-nucleotide
Lisp SBCL #4	20.81	53,228	1435
Java 6 -server	15.89	70,964	1052
regex-dna
Lisp SBCL	10.88	276,452	586
Java 6 -server #4	7.81	75,892	921
nsieve
Lisp SBCL #2	3.31	37,488	351
Java 6 -server #3	2.25	20,592	296
nsieve-bits
Lisp SBCL #2	7.57	21,180	376
Java 6 -server #4	5.04	13,364	523
n-body
Lisp SBCL	22.53	16,952	1363
Java 6 -server #2	14.75	11,524	1424
fasta
Lisp SBCL	36.23	16,824	1419
Java 6 -server #2	21.46	9,184	1240
mandelbrot
Lisp SBCL #2	6.23	17,840	653
Java 6 -server #3	3.24	11,092	623
sum-file
Lisp SBCL #4	11.83	26,848	167
Java 6 -server #4	4.10	9,972	226
pidigits
Lisp SBCL #2	6.00	32,876	645
Java 6 -server #2	1.92	8,992	938

This is SBCL 1.0.15-gentoo, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.