PLEASE CHOOSE THE UP-TO-DATE MEASUREMENTS INSTEAD OF THESE! (Read the FAQ!) |
Compare the performance of Lisp SBCL programs against some other language implementation.
For more information about the Lisp implementation we measured see ↓ about Lisp SBCL.
| 1/2 1/3 1/4 Lisp SBCL is better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programs | Time | Memory Use | Source Size | Reduced N |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| partial-sums | 1/2 | 2 | ± | |
| binary-trees | 1/2 | ± | ± | |
| fannkuch | ± | 2 | ± | |
| reverse-complement | ± | 1/2 | 2 | |
| spectral-norm | ± | 2 | ± | |
| recursive | ± | ± | ± | |
| k-nucleotide | ± | ± | ± | |
| regex-dna | ± | 4 | 1/2 | |
| nsieve | ± | 2 | ± | |
| nsieve-bits | 2 | 2 | ± | |
| n-body | 2 | ± | ± | |
| fasta | 2 | 2 | ± | |
| mandelbrot | 2 | 2 | ± | |
| sum-file | 3 | 3 | ± | |
| pidigits | 3 | 4 | ± | |
± look at the measurements
online book Practical Common Lisp
This is SBCL 1.0.15-gentoo, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
Home Page: http://sbcl.sourceforge.net/
Download: http://sbcl.sourceforge.net/