SML MLton ÷ C++ GNU g++ | Gentoo : Intel® Pentium® 4 Computer Language Benchmarks Game

Compare the performance of SML MLton programs against some other language implementation.

For more information about the SML implementation we measured see ↓ about SML MLton.

Compare to:

SML MLton comparison summary

± look at the measurements

Program & Logs	CPU secs	Memory KB	Size B
binary-trees
SML MLton #2	3.20	45,760	530
C++ GNU g++ #2	4.47	6,996	541
partial-sums
SML MLton #2	4.73	740	541
C++ GNU g++ #3	4.05	852	531
fasta
SML MLton	22.75	2,856	1323
C++ GNU g++ #4	18.72	788	1248
sum-file
SML MLton	8.03	976	164
C++ GNU g++ #2	6.47	852	260
nsieve
SML MLton #2	3.05	36,740	367
C++ GNU g++ #3	2.08	5,764	313
spectral-norm
SML MLton	37.40	1,304	444
C++ GNU g++	23.84	900	442
nsieve-bits
SML MLton #2	6.70	5,248	488
C++ GNU g++	3.86	3,316	494
n-body
SML MLton #2	27.27	740	1327
C++ GNU g++ #2	14.62	932	1705
pidigits
SML MLton #2	3.25	2,236	498
C++ GNU g++ #2	1.66	1,052	652
mandelbrot
SML MLton #2	6.04	704	457
C++ GNU g++ #4	3.02	896	1097
fannkuch
SML MLton	17.75	708	606
C++ GNU g++ #2	7.78	844	554
k-nucleotide
SML MLton	20.86	163,372	1068
C++ GNU g++ #3	7.46	9,304	1380
recursive
SML MLton #2	7.97	1,384	453
C++ GNU g++ #2	2.40	1,008	566
reverse-complement
SML MLton	1.82	80,060	837
C++ GNU g++ #3	0.54	13,288	810