Compare the performance of OCaml programs against some other language implementation, or check the OCaml CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the OCaml implementation we measured see ↓ about OCaml.
Are the OCaml programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the OCaml programs than the corresponding C GNU gcc programs?
| OCaml x times better ~ C GNU gcc x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | ~1.3 | ~1.9 | 1.5 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~1.4 | ~1.5 | 1.3 | |
| fasta | ~1.4 | ~1.4 | 1.3 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~2.1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | |
| mandelbrot | ~1.9 | ~1.9 | 1.3 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | ~4.5 | ~1.6 | ~1.1 | |
| nsieve | ~1.0 | ~1.8 | 1.1 | |
| nsieve-bits | ~1.1 | ~1.7 | 1.1 | |
| partial-sums | ~1.1 | ~1.6 | 1.4 | |
| pidigits | ||||
| recursive | ~2.9 | ~2.3 | 1.1 | |
| regex-dna | 1.1 | ~3.6 | 1.8 | |
| reverse-complement | ~1.5 | ~3.5 | 1.4 | |
| spectral-norm | ~1.2 | ~2.8 | 1.0 | |
| startup | ~2.4 | 3.2 | ||
| sum-file | ~1.7 | ~2.2 | 1.5 | |
| thread-ring | ~1.4 | 1.6 | 1.7 | |
about OCaml
The Objective Caml toplevel, version 3.10.1
Home Page: http://www.ocaml.org/
Download: http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/distrib.html
