Compare the performance of Pascal Free Pascal programs against some other language implementation, or check the Pascal CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the Pascal implementation we measured see ↓ about Pascal Free Pascal.
Are the Pascal Free Pascal programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the Pascal Free Pascal programs than the corresponding C GNU gcc programs?
| Pascal Free Pascal x times better ~ C GNU gcc x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | ~1.0 | 1.1 | ~1.1 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~1.1 | 4.1 | ~1.1 | |
| fasta | ~1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~1.5 | 3.4 | ~2.0 | |
| mandelbrot | ~1.9 | 3.7 | 1.1 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | ~1.1 | 1.5 | ~1.1 | |
| nsieve | ~1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | |
| nsieve-bits | ~1.1 | 1.0 | ~1.1 | |
| partial-sums | ~1.0 | 1.3 | 1.5 | |
| pidigits | 1.0 | ~1.0 | ~1.2 | |
| recursive | ~1.6 | 1.1 | ~1.1 | |
| regex-dna | ||||
| reverse-complement | ~1.1 | ~1.0 | ~1.0 | |
| spectral-norm | ~1.1 | 1.6 | ~1.1 | |
| startup | ~1.1 | 2.1 | ||
| sum-file | 1.1 | 3.5 | 1.0 | |
| thread-ring | ~1.0 | 1.7 | ~1.1 | |
about Pascal Free Pascal
Pascal and its Successors - Niklaus Wirth
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.2.0 [2007/09/14] for i386
Home Page: http://www.freepascal.org
Download: http://www.freepascal.org/download.html
