Compare the performance of Pike programs against some other language implementation, or check the Pike CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the Pike implementation we measured see ↓ about Pike.
Are the Pike programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the Pike programs than the corresponding Perl programs?
| Pike x times better ~ Perl x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | 3.1 | 2.9 | 1.1 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | 1.4 | ~2.2 | ~1.4 | |
| fasta | 1.2 | ~1.8 | ~1.0 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~1.5 | 1.1 | ~2.1 | |
| mandelbrot | 2.5 | ~1.9 | ~1.3 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | 1.2 | ~1.8 | ~1.1 | |
| nsieve | 2.1 | 1.9 | 1.1 | |
| nsieve-bits | ~2.8 | ~10.8 | ~1.2 | |
| partial-sums | ||||
| pidigits | 1.3 | ~1.4 | ~1.0 | |
| recursive | 5.8 | 2.0 | ~1.0 | |
| regex-dna | 2.2 | 1.9 | ~1.0 | |
| reverse-complement | ~3.9 | 1.3 | ~1.1 | |
| spectral-norm | 3.9 | ~1.4 | ~1.0 | |
| startup | ~18 | ~2.0 | ||
| sum-file | 1.5 | ~2.4 | ~2.8 | |
| thread-ring | ||||
about Pike
Pike v7.6 release 86
Home Page: http://pike.roxen.com/
Download: http://pike.roxen.com/download/
