Compare the performance of Tcl programs against some other language implementation, or check the Tcl CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the Tcl implementation we measured see ↓ about Tcl.
Are the Tcl programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the Tcl programs than the corresponding Perl programs?
| Tcl x times better ~ Perl x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.0 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~2.4 | ~1.3 | ~1.5 | |
| fasta | ~2.8 | ~27 | 1.0 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~4.9 | 1.4 | ~1.6 | |
| mandelbrot | ~1.6 | ~1.1 | ~1.5 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | ~2.7 | ~1.0 | ~1.3 | |
| nsieve | ~1.4 | 5.5 | ||
| nsieve-bits | ~3.4 | ~4.9 | ~1.7 | |
| partial-sums | ~2.1 | ~1.3 | ~1.2 | |
| pidigits | ~3.3 | 1.2 | ~1.6 | |
| recursive | ~1.4 | ~2.3 | ~1.2 | |
| regex-dna | 4.2 | ~1.0 | 1.2 | |
| reverse-complement | ~5.6 | ~1.3 | ~1.3 | |
| spectral-norm | ~1.3 | ~1.0 | ~1.3 | |
| startup | ~2.0 | 1.1 | ||
| sum-file | ~4.0 | ~1.3 | ~1.2 | |
| thread-ring | ||||
about Tcl
Tcl 8.5b2 (Oct 26, 2007)
Home Page: http://tcl.tk/
Download: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/
