Compare the performance of Rebol programs against some other language implementation, or check the Rebol CPU time and Memory use measurements.
For more information about the Rebol implementation we measured see ↓ about Rebol.
Are the Rebol programs better?
For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.
How many times better?
How many times faster or smaller are the Rebol programs than the corresponding Perl programs?
| Rebol x times better ~ Perl x times better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program & Logs | Faster | Smaller: Memory Use | Smaller: GZip Bytes | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | ~7.4 | ~1.6 | 1.1 | |
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| fannkuch | ~6.9 | ~4.5 | ~1.2 | |
| fasta | ~8.2 | ~3.7 | ~1.1 | |
| k-nucleotide | ~192 | ~1.5 | ~2.5 | 100,000 |
| mandelbrot | ~4.7 | ~3.8 | ~1.5 | |
| meteor-contest | ||||
| n-body | ~7.9 | ~1.4 | ~1.0 | |
| nsieve | ~6.5 | ~1.0 | ~1.3 | |
| nsieve-bits | ||||
| partial-sums | ||||
| pidigits | ||||
| recursive | ~3.0 | ~4.0 | ~1.3 | 3 |
| regex-dna | ||||
| reverse-complement | ~66 | ~1.3 | ~1.2 | |
| spectral-norm | ~3.7 | ~3.0 | ~1.6 | 3,000 |
| startup | ~5.3 | ~4.6 | ||
| sum-file | ~3.9 | ~335 | ~2.1 | |
| thread-ring | ||||
about Rebol
REBOL/Core 2.6.2.4.2
Home Page: http://www.rebol.com/
Download: http://www.rebol.com/platforms.html
