/mobile Handheld Friendly website

÷

 Step 1 : Are the Haskell GHC programs faster? At a glance.

This chart shows 3 comparisons - Time-used, Memory-used and Code-used ~ speed and size.

Each chart bar shows, for one unidentified benchmark, how much the fastest Haskell GHC program used compared to the fastest Java 7 -server program.


Look at speed another way - look at a box plot of Time-used data.

 Step 2 : Are the Haskell GHC programs faster? Approximately.

This table shows 3 comparisons - Time-used, Memory-used and Code-used ~ speed and size.

Each table row shows, for one named benchmark, how much the fastest Haskell GHC program used compared to the fastest Java 7 -server program.

 Haskell GHC used what fraction? used how many times more? 
Benchmark Time Memory Code
 pidigits±1/81/5
 spectral-norm±1/12±
 regex-dna±1/3
 reverse-complement±1/21/2
 binary-trees±±1/2
 fannkuch-redux1/12±
 n-body1/7±
 fasta1/8±
 k-nucleotide±±
 Haskell GHC used what fraction? used how many times more? 
Time-used  |-  |---  25% median  75%  ---|  -|
(Elapsed secs)±±±±

± read the measurements and then read the program source code.

 Step 3 : Are the Haskell GHC programs faster? Measurements.

This table shows 5 measurements - CPU Time, Elapsed Time, Memory, Code and ≈ CPU Load ~ speed and size.

For each named benchmark, measurements of the fastest Haskell GHC program are shown for comparison against measurements of the fastest Java 7 -server program.

Program Source Code CPU secs Elapsed secs Memory KB Code B ≈ CPU Load
 pidigits 
Haskell GHC7.284.724,864341  23% 60% 32% 38%
Java 7 -server9.254.6941,1561808  77% 27% 15% 74%
 spectral-norm 
Haskell GHC18.774.841,172984  97% 97% 97% 97%
Java 7 -server16.274.1814,224950  96% 97% 98% 98%
 regex-dna 
Haskell GHC45.6212.03205,7761518  93% 96% 96% 95%
Java 7 -server28.0210.02682,200929  66% 62% 62% 92%
 reverse-complement 
Haskell GHC2.222.01125,816999  4% 2% 100% 4%
Java 7 -server3.021.54294,3561661  42% 32% 71% 52%
 binary-trees 
Haskell GHC38.7913.26406,632612  78% 65% 83% 68%
Java 7 -server20.549.73522,4841007  55% 27% 76% 57%
 fannkuch-redux 
Haskell GHC120.5230.651,1721153  100% 96% 99% 100%
Java 7 -server67.8617.1713,7321282  98% 98% 99% 100%
 n-body 
Haskell GHC52.7150.341,9561695  26% 23% 33% 23%
Java 7 -server24.2924.2613,6681424  0% 0% 100% 0%
 fasta 
Haskell GHC15.5914.531,9561413  20% 53% 21% 15%
Java 7 -server4.964.8914,7841507  1% 1% 1% 100%
 k-nucleotide 
Haskell GHC89.9441.11344,1122749  70% 47% 70% 34%
Java 7 -server33.749.19386,0602431  90% 90% 91% 97%
 fasta-redux 
No program
Java 7 -server0.130.11?1443  18% 0% 100% 20%
 mandelbrot 
Haskell GHCBad Output
Java 7 -server0.300.13?802  43% 42% 93% 50%

 Step 4 : Are there other Haskell GHC programs for these benchmarks?

Remember - those are just the fastest Haskell GHC and Java 7 -server programs measured on this OS/machine. Check if there are other implementations of these benchmark programs for Haskell GHC.

Maybe one of those other Haskell GHC programs is fastest on a different OS/machine.

 Step 5 : Are there other faster programs for these benchmarks?

Remember - those are just the fastest Haskell GHC and Java 7 -server programs measured on this OS/machine. Check if there are faster implementations of these benchmark programs for other programming languages.

Maybe one of those other programs is fastest on a different OS/machine.

 Haskell GHC : lazy pure functional programming 

The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 7.4.1

Home Page: http://www.haskell.org/

Download: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/

Revised BSD license

  Home   Conclusions   License   Help