Are the Haskell GHC programs faster?
Do the Haskell GHC programs use optimized assembly code libraries? Are they small simple programs or very optimized programs? Do the Haskell GHC programs use a fraction of the time used by other programs or do they use several times more?
| Haskell GHC used what fraction? used how many times more? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programs | Time | Memory | Code | Reduced N |
| ↓ chameneos-redux | 1/2 | 1/5 | 1/2 | |
| ↓ pidigits | ± | 1/6 | 1/5 | |
| ↓ regex-dna | ± | 1/3 | ± | |
| ↓ spectral-norm | ± | 1/7 | ± | |
| ↓ mandelbrot | ± | ± | ± | |
| ↓ reverse-complement | ± | ± | 2× | |
| ↓ binary-trees | 2× | ± | ± | |
| ↓ fasta | 2× | 1/8 | ± | |
| ↓ n-body | 2× | 1/7 | ± | |
| ↓ fannkuch | 2× | 1/3 | ± | |
| ↓ k-nucleotide | 4× | 1/2 | 2× | |
± look at the measurements and then look at the programs.
Are the Haskell GHC programs faster?
| Program & Logs | CPU secs | Elapsed secs | Memory KB | Code B | ~ CPU Load |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| chameneos-redux | |||||
| Haskell GHC | 8.40 | 4.59 | 2,392 | 832 | 0% 99% 0% 84% |
| Java 6 -server | 22.80 | 8.24 | 12,592 | 1377 | 50% 54% 84% 73% |
| pidigits | |||||
| Haskell GHC | 3.77 | 3.78 | 5,192 | 331 | 0% 0% 1% 100% |
| Java 6 -server | 12.95 | 5.00 | 28,624 | 1816 | 61% 59% 57% 55% |
| regex-dna | |||||
| Haskell GHC | 36.34 | 12.57 | 167,056 | 1672 | 63% 61% 65% 96% |
| Java 6 -server | 46.23 | 15.86 | 578,852 | 1534 | 71% 66% 85% 69% |
| spectral-norm | |||||
| Haskell GHC | 15.67 | 4.04 | 1,752 | 869 | 96% 98% 97% 98% |
| Java 6 -server | 15.95 | 4.11 | 12,552 | 950 | 97% 97% 98% 97% |
| mandelbrot | |||||
| Haskell GHC | 54.32 | 13.63 | 34,932 | 772 | 99% 100% 100% 100% |
| Java 6 -server | 43.12 | 10.95 | 48,920 | 903 | 98% 98% 99% 98% |
| reverse-complement | |||||
| Haskell GHC | 4.00 | 4.00 | 618,012 | 913 | 0% 0% 0% 100% |
| Java 6 -server | 2.98 | 2.94 | 473,712 | 592 | 1% 94% 4% 2% |
| binary-trees | |||||
| Haskell GHC | 49.53 | 33.05 | 194,792 | 512 | 17% 58% 57% 17% |
| Java 6 -server | 29.63 | 19.18 | 289,920 | 603 | 24% 75% 27% 28% |
| fasta | |||||
| Haskell GHC | 15.58 | 15.58 | 1,680 | 1096 | 100% 0% 0% 0% |
| Java 6 -server | 7.50 | 7.49 | 12,648 | 1240 | 0% 1% 99% 0% |
| n-body | |||||
| Haskell GHC | 53.79 | 53.79 | 1,764 | 1687 | 100% 0% 0% 0% |
| Java 6 -server | 25.03 | 25.03 | 12,408 | 1424 | 100% 0% 0% 0% |
| fannkuch | |||||
| Haskell GHC | 156.66 | 40.06 | 4,040 | 1204 | 96% 96% 96% 96% |
| Java 6 -server | 66.26 | 18.43 | 13,776 | 1150 | 78% 77% 98% 99% |
| k-nucleotide | |||||
| Haskell GHC | 112.51 | 52.02 | 407,916 | 2749 | 47% 38% 71% 37% |
| Java 6 -server | 47.53 | 14.24 | 762,548 | 1602 | 80% 80% 95% 79% |
Haskell GHC : lazy pure functional programming
The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 6.10.3
Home Page: http://www.haskell.org/
Download: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/
