Compare the performance of Lisaac programs against some other language implementation.
For more information about the Lisaac implementation we measured see ↓ about Lisaac.
Lisaac comparison summary
| 1/2 1/3 1/4 … Lisaac is better | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programs | Time | Memory Use | Source Size | Reduced N |
| binary-trees | ||||
| chameneos-redux | ||||
| k-nucleotide | ||||
| spectral-norm | ||||
| fannkuch | ± | 1/3 | ± | |
| n-body | ± | 1/2 | ± | |
| fasta | ± | 1/2 | ± | |
| regex-dna | ± | 2 | ± | 500,000 |
| pidigits | 2 | ± | ± | |
| reverse-complement | 5 | ± | ± | |
| mandelbrot | 5 | 1/73 | ± | |
± look at the measurements
Lisaac comparison measurements
| Program & Logs | CPU secs | Memory KB | Size B | Elapsed secs | ~ CPU Load |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fannkuch | |||||
| Lisaac | 54.28 | 404 | 788 | 54.29 | 100% 0% 0% 0% |
| C++ GNU g++ #2 | 71.42 | 1,092 | 554 | 71.41 | 100% 0% 0% 0% |
| n-body | |||||
| Lisaac | 24.53 | 512 | 1615 | 24.54 | 0% 0% 0% 100% |
| C++ GNU g++ #4 | 23.84 | 788 | 1428 | 23.84 | 1% 0% 100% 0% |
| fasta | |||||
| Lisaac | 6.95 | 432 | 1463 | 6.95 | 100% 0% 0% 0% |
| C++ GNU g++ #4 | 6.07 | 744 | 1266 | 6.07 | 0% 100% 0% 0% |
| regex-dna N = 500,000 reduced workload | |||||
| Lisaac | 3.52 | 26,136 | 1299 | 3.52 | 0% 100% 0% 0% |
| C++ GNU g++ #3 | 2.88 | 10,932 | 1599 | 2.88 | 0% 100% 0% 0% |
| pidigits | |||||
| Lisaac | 5.22 | 1,124 | 928 | 5.22 | 0% 0% 0% 100% |
| C++ GNU g++ #3 | 2.71 | 1,596 | 682 | 2.72 | 0% 9% 7% 100% |
| reverse-complement | |||||
| Lisaac #2 | 5.10 | 253,528 | 762 | 5.10 | 0% 100% 0% 0% |
| C++ GNU g++ #2 | 1.81 | 245,092 | 1098 | 1.13 | 15% 31% 21% 88% |
| mandelbrot | |||||
| Lisaac | 31.41 | 392 | 653 | 31.41 | 0% 100% 0% 0% |
| C++ GNU g++ #5 | 24.70 | 28,800 | 858 | 6.18 | 100% 100% 100% 100% |
about Lisaac
Lisaac V 0.13.1
Lisaac prototype language Programmers Reference Manual (pdf)
Home Page: Lisaac: The power of simplicity at work for operating systems
Download: Compiler and library
