x64 Ubuntu : Intel® Q6600® one core
Computer Language Benchmarks Game      Help

- all benchmarks - binary-trees chameneos-redux fannkuch fasta k-nucleotide mandelbrot meteor-contest n-body pidigits regex-dna reverse-complement spectral-norm thread-ring - all languages - Ada 2005 GNAT ATS C GNU gcc C# Mono C++ GNU g++ Clean Erlang HiPE F# Mono Fortran Intel Go 6g 8g Haskell GHC Java 6 -server Java 6 -Xint Java 6 steady state JavaScript TraceMonkey JavaScript V8 Lisp SBCL Lua OCaml Pascal Free Pascal Perl PHP Python CPython Ruby JRuby Ruby MRI Scala Scheme PLT Smalltalk VisualWorks

÷ Ada 2005 GNAT ATS C GNU gcc C# Mono C++ GNU g++ Clean Erlang HiPE F# Mono Fortran Intel Go 6g 8g Haskell GHC Java 6 -server Java 6 -Xint Java 6 steady state JavaScript TraceMonkey JavaScript V8 Lisp SBCL Lua OCaml Pascal Free Pascal Perl PHP Python CPython Ruby JRuby Ruby MRI Scala Scheme PLT Smalltalk VisualWorks

 Step 1 : Are the Java 6 -Xint programs faster? At a glance.

This chart shows 3 comparisons - Time-used, Memory-used and Code-used.

Each chart bar shows, for one unidentified benchmark, how much the fastest Java 6 -Xint program used compared to the fastest Perl program.

 Step 2 : Are the Java 6 -Xint programs faster? Approximately.

This table shows 3 comparisons - Time-used, Memory-used and Code-used.

Each table row shows, for one named benchmark, how much the fastest Java 6 -Xint program used compared to the fastest Perl program.

Java 6 -Xint used what fraction? used how many times more?
Benchmark	Time	Memory	Code	Reduced N
spectral-norm	1/12	±	±
binary-trees	1/11	1/2	±
mandelbrot	1/9	16×	3×
n-body	1/6	5×	±
fasta	1/6	5×	±
fannkuch	1/4	6×	3×
pidigits	±	3×	2×
k-nucleotide	4×	1/2	4×
reverse-complement	5×	±	2×
regex-dna	9×	4×	2×

± read the measurements and then read the program source code.

 Step 3 : Are the Java 6 -Xint programs faster? Measurements.

This table shows 5 measurements - CPU Time, Elapsed Time, Memory, Code and ~ CPU Load.

For each named benchmark, measurements of the fastest Java 6 -Xint program are shown for comparison against measurements of the fastest Perl program.

Program Source Code	CPU secs	Elapsed secs	Memory KB	Code B	~ CPU Load
spectral-norm
Java 6 -Xint	93.00	93.02	12,944	950	3% 0% 0% 100%
Perl	1,094.72	1,094.65	11,060	846	0% 0% 0% 100%
binary-trees
Java 6 -Xint	131.42	131.49	547,096	603	0% 0% 0% 100%
Perl	1,490.64	1,490.58	1,091,276	541	0% 0% 0% 100%
mandelbrot
Java 6 -Xint	497.81	497.81	64,788	903	0% 0% 0% 100%
Perl	4,387.61	4,387.50	4,132	311	0% 0% 0% 100%
n-body
Java 6 -Xint	257.48	257.49	12,400	1424	0% 0% 0% 100%
Perl	1,639.61	1,639.53	2,572	1140	0% 0% 0% 100%
fasta
Java 6 -Xint	49.46	49.46	12,016	1240	0% 0% 0% 100%
Perl	311.00	310.98	2,548	934	1% 1% 1% 100%
fannkuch
Java 6 -Xint	652.83	652.84	12,240	1150	0% 0% 0% 100%
Perl	2,660.57	2,660.43	2,060	391	0% 0% 0% 100%
pidigits
Java 6 -Xint	6.99	7.01	13,448	938	0% 0% 0% 100%
Perl	7.47	7.48	3,884	385	0% 0% 0% 100%
k-nucleotide
Java 6 -Xint	880.31	880.31	324,680	1602	0% 0% 0% 100%
Perl	225.09	228.97	780,228	359	0% 0% 0% 100%
reverse-complement
Java 6 -Xint	26.94	26.97	460,756	592	0% 0% 0% 100%
Perl	5.30	5.30	433,056	298	0% 0% 0% 100%
regex-dna
Java 6 -Xint	338.47	338.46	676,912	929	0% 0% 1% 100%
Perl	38.78	38.78	165,064	527	0% 0% 0% 100%
chameneos-redux
Java 6 -Xint	49.44	49.48	39,112	1462	1% 1% 0% 100%
	No Perl

 Measurements for all the accepted programs

Ada 2005 GNAT ATS C GNU gcc C# Mono C++ GNU g++ Clean Erlang HiPE F# Mono Fortran Intel Go 6g 8g Haskell GHC Java 6 -server Java 6 -Xint Java 6 steady state JavaScript TraceMonkey JavaScript V8 Lisp SBCL Lua OCaml Pascal Free Pascal Perl PHP Python CPython Ruby JRuby Ruby MRI Scala Scheme PLT Smalltalk VisualWorks

 Java 6 -Xint : ubiquitous bytecode interpreter virtual machine 

java version "1.6.0_14"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_14-b08)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b16, interpreted mode)

Home Page: http://java.sun.com/j2se/

Download: http://java.sun.com/j2se/downloads/